<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2345-5837</Issn>
      <Volume>11</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Comparison of Lung and Contralateral Scattered Breast Dose between Field-in-Field and Wedge Techniques in Patients with Early Breast Cancer</title>
    <FirstPage>486</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>491</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seraj Adin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Zare</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Medical Physics, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bahador</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Samira</FirstName>
        <LastName>Yazdani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Medical Physics, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>20</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the dosimetric result of the Field-In-Field (FIF) plans compared with Tangential Wedged Beams (TWB) plans for whole breast radiotherapy of patients.
Materials and Methods: In this survey, we entered fifty patients with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative whole-breast radiotherapy. FIF and a TWB plan were made for each patient to compare dosimetric outcomes.
Results: The Homogeneity Index (HI) and Conformity Index (CI) were specified for the evaluation of Planning Target Volume (PTV). The mean dose of the ipsilateral lung and contra-lateral breast for the evaluation of organs at risk dose were used. The FIF plans had significantly lower HI (p &lt; 0.01) and CI (p &lt; 0.01) than those of the TWB plans. It means in the dosimetric comparisons of the PTV, the FIF plans were better than the TWB plans. The V10lung (31.152vs. 32.72%, p &lt; 0.01), V20lung (25.6064vs. 26.6%, p &lt; 0.01) V30lung (17.4% vs. 18.4%, p &lt; 0.01) were lower with the FIF plans compared with those of the TWB plans, with statistical significance. The FIF plans had a lower mean dose for the lung than those of TWB plans (1225.48 vs. 1670.32 cGy) but no statistical significance (p=0.06). The mean dose in the contra-lateral of the breast in FIF plans was lower than in TWB plans (61.666 vs. 163.45 cGy), with statistical significance (p &lt; 0.01).
Conclusion: The FIF plans increased the dose homogeneity, and conformity of the target volume for the whole-breast irradiation compared with the TWB plans contralateral breast. Moreover, the doses of organs at risk (ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast) were reduced with FIF plans.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://fbt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fbt/article/view/628</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://fbt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fbt/article/download/628/330</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
