Small Magnets, Big Future: Low-Field MRI Technology and Clinical Utility
,
Abstract
Background:
Despite the clinical advances made in magnetic resonance imaging with high static magnetic fields (1.5T and more), open MRI with low field (0.2-0.5T) has recently attracted the attention of researchers.
Low-field MRI (LF-MRI) has both advantages and disadvantages over high-field units. It enables the scanning of anxious patients and children who are unable to tolerate enclosed high-field scanners due to discomfort. The open configuration of the LF-MRI provides a spacious examination environment. It also allows the safe imaging of metallic devices owing to the lower static field and radiofrequency. While image quality is degraded compared to high-field MRI due to a lower signal-to-noise ratio, technological advances may help address this limitation.
Objectives:
This review aimed to provide a comprehensive outline of the current applications, technical aspects, and evidence supporting the diagnostic accuracy of Low-Field MRI.
Methods:
A literature search was conducted in Google Scholar and PubMed from 2021-present using the search term "low field MRI" limited to the title. Studies were excluded if only on high-field MRI, not in English, or conference abstracts without full text. After applying exclusion criteria, 32 relevant articles remained for analysis.
Results:
The results showed that portable low-field MRI expanded the availability of MRI beyond fixed facilities. One study found 0.55T MRI had an accuracy similar to of 1.5T for microbleed detection, suggesting its potential as an efficient alternative for stroke diagnosis. The literature has demonstrated the utility of low-field MRI in applications such as musculoskeletal, breast, and abdominal imaging.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, these studies demonstrated the potential of low-field MRI as a cost-efficient alternative to high-field MRI for several clinical applications. The reduced costs and accessibility afforded by low-field designs have positioned this technology to increase diagnostic MRI access globally. However, further validation of diagnostic performance and cost-utility analyses accounting for accuracy are still needed.
1. Mohan P, Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy S, Subramani N, Subramanian M, Meckanzi S. Handcrafted Deep-Feature-Based Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using MRI Images. Electronics. 2022;11(24):4178. 2. Giovannetti G, Frijia F, Flori A. Radiofrequency Coils for Low-Field (0.18–0.55 T) Magnetic Resonance Scanners: Experience from a Research Lab–Manufacturing Companies Cooperation. Electronics. 2022;11(24):4233. 3. de Vos B, Parsa J, Abdulrazaq Z, Teeuwisse WM, Van Speybroeck CDE, de Gans DH, et al. Design, Characterisation and Performance of an Improved Portable and Sustainable Low-Field MRI System. Frontiers in Physics. 2021;9. 4. Marques JP, Simonis FFJ, Webb AG. Low-field MRI: An MR physics perspective. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;49(6):1528-42. 5. Pires T, M.M J. The Rise and Efficiency of Low Field Portable MRI Scanners. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 2023(EFirst). 6. Shaffer A, Kwok SS, Naik A, Anderson AT, Lam F, Wszalek T, et al. Ultra-High-Field MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Gliomas: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13. 7. Lyu M, Mei L, Huang S, Liu S, Li Y, Yang K, et al. M4Raw: A multi-contrast, multi-repetition, multi-channel MRI k-space dataset for low-field MRI research. Scientific Data. 2023;10(1):264. 8. Guo W, Xu W, Fan C, Fu H, Meng T, Pang Y, et al. Gallium-68-Labelled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in the Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer: Comparison With [18F]FDG PET/CT. 2022. 9. Deoni SCL, Medeiros P, Deoni AT, Burton P, Beauchemin J, D'Sa V, et al. Development of a mobile low-field MRI scanner. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5690. 10. Cooley CZ, McDaniel PC, Stockmann JP, Srinivas SA, Cauley SF, Śliwiak M, et al. A portable scanner for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Nature biomedical engineering. 2021;5(3):229-39. 11. Anoardo E, Rodriguez GG. New challenges and opportunities for low-field MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open. 2023;14-15:100086. 12. Sarracanie M, Salameh N, editors. Low-Field MRI: How Low Can We Go? A Fresh View on an Old Debate. Frontiers of Physics; 2020. 13. Lau V, Xiao L, Zhao Y, Su S, Ding Y, Man C, et al. Pushing the limits of low-cost ultra-low-field MRI by dual-acquisition deep learning 3D superresolution. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2023;90(2):400-16. 14. Schröder FF, Post CE, van Raak SM, Simonis FFJ, Wagenaar FBM, Huis In't Veld R, et al. The diagnostic potential of low-field MRI in problematic total knee arthroplasties - a feasibility study. Journal of experimental orthopaedics. 2020;7(1):59. 15. Joost TA, Brecht P, Mayer F, Cassel M. Feasibility Of Open Low-field MRI Measurements In Adolescent Athletes With Spondylolisthesis: 2846 Board #307 May 29 9:30 AM - 11:00 AM. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2020;52(7S). 16. Guallart-Naval T, Algarín JM, Pellicer-Guridi R, Galve F, Vives-Gilabert Y, Bosch R, et al. Portable magnetic resonance imaging of patients indoors, outdoors and at home. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13147. 17. Winter L, Seifert F, Zilberti L, Murbach M, Ittermann B. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;53(6):1646-65. 18. Breit HC, Vosshenrich J, Clauss M, Weikert TJ, Stieltjes B, Kovacs BK, et al. Visual and quantitative assessment of hip implant-related metal artifacts at low field MRI: a phantom study comparing a 0.55-T system with 1.5-T and 3-T systems. European radiology experimental. 2023;7(1):5. 19. Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, Bhattacharya I, Basar B, Herzka DA, et al. Opportunities in interventional and diagnostic imaging by using high-performance low-field-strength MRI. Radiology. 2019;293(2):384-93. 20. Anazodo U, Ng JJ, Ehiogu B, Obungoloch J, Fatade A, Henk JMMM, et al. A Framework for Advancing Sustainable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Access in Africa. NMR in Biomedicine. 2022. 21. Gutierrez-Barrios A, Cañadas-Pruaño D, Noval-Morillas I, Gheorghe L, Zayas-Rueda R, Calle-Perez G. Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations. World journal of cardiology. 2022;14(1):1-12. 22. Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, Bhattacharya I, Basar B, Herzka DA, et al. Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI. Radiology. 2019. 23. Borm PJ, Simonetti OP, Armstrong AK. Low field MRI impact on interventions. 24. Satya P, Adams Jr J, Venkataraman SS, Kumar D, Narayanan R, Nacev A, et al. Office-based, single-sided, low-field MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Cureus. 2022;14(5). 25. Sze C, Singh Z, Punyala A, Satya P, Sadinski M, Narayan R, et al. Feasibility and preliminary clinical tolerability of low-field MRI-guided prostate biopsy. The Prostate. 2023;83(7):656-62. 26. Sheth KN, Mazurek MH, Yuen MMF, Cahn BA, Shah J, Ward A, et al. Assessment of Brain Injury Using Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging at the Bedside of Critically Ill Patients. Jama Neurology. 2021. 27. Rusche T, Breit H-C, Bach M, Wasserthal J, Gehweiler J, Manneck S, et al. Potential of Stroke Imaging Using a New Prototype of Low-Field MRI: A Prospective Direct 0.55 T/1.5 T Scanner Comparison. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(10):2798. 28. Moran MB. Can Low-field Portable MRI Widen Access to Rapid Screening for Stroke? Neurology Today. 2022. 29. Liu Y, Leong ATL, Zhao Y, Xiao L, Mak HKF, Tsang ACO, et al. A low-cost and shielding-free ultra-low-field brain MRI scanner. Nature communications. 2021;12(1):7238. 30. Sheth KN, Yuen MM, Mazurek MH, Cahn BA, Prabhat AM, Salehi S, et al. Bedside detection of intracranial midline shift using portable magnetic resonance imaging. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):67. 31. Campbell-Washburn AE, Malayeri AA, Jones EC, Moss J, Fennelly KP, Olivier KN, et al. T2-weighted Lung Imaging Using a 0.55-T MRI System. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2021;3(3):e200611. 32. Hinsen M, Nagel AM, May MS, Wiesmueller M, Uder M, Heiss R. Lung Nodule Detection With Modern Low-Field MRI (0.55 T) in Comparison to CT. Investigative Radiology. 9900:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001006. 33. Heiss R, Grodzki DM, Horger W, Uder M, Nagel AM, Bickelhaupt S. High-performance low field MRI enables visualization of persistent pulmonary damage after COVID-19. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2021;76:49-51. 34. Lopez Schmidt I, Haag N, Shahzadi I, Frohwein LJ, Schneider C, Niehoff JH, et al. Diagnostic Image Quality of a Low-Field (0.55T) Knee MRI Protocol Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Compared with a Standard (1.5T) Knee MRI Protocol. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;12(5):1916. 35. Thiim KR, Singh E, Mukundan S, Grant PE, Yang E, El-Dib M, et al. Clinical experience with an in-NICU magnetic resonance imaging system. Journal of Perinatology. 2022;42(7):873-9. 36. Cho S-M, Wilcox C, Keller S, Acton M, Rando H, Etchill E, et al. Assessing the SAfety and FEasibility of bedside portable low-field brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients on ECMO (SAFE-MRI ECMO study): study protocol and first case series experience. Critical Care. 2022;26(1):119. 37. Maura ES, Amie LR, Houchun HH, Chris RN, Ara SH, Marcie GF, et al. Feasibility of and experience using a portable MRI scanner in the neonatal intensive care unit. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2023;108(1):45. 38. Murali S, Ding H, Adedeji F, Qin C, Obungoloch J, Asllani I, et al. Bringing MRI to low- and middle-income countries: Directions, challenges and potential solutions. NMR in Biomedicine.n/a(n/a):e4992. 39. Wilcox C, Acton M, Rando H, Keller S, Sair HI, Chinedozi I, et al. Safety of Bedside Portable Low-Field Brain MRI in ECMO Patients Supported on Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;12(11). 40. Prabhat AM, Crawford AL, Mazurek MH, Yuen MM, Chavva IR, Ward A, et al. Methodology for Low-Field, Portable Magnetic Resonance Neuroimaging at the Bedside. Front Neurol. 2021;12:760321. 41. Parasuram NR, Crawford AL, Mazurek MH, Chavva IR, Beekman R, Gilmore EJ, et al. Future of Neurology & Technology: Neuroimaging Made Accessible Using Low-Field, Portable MRI. Neurology. 2023;100(22):1067-71. 42. Sabir H, Kipfmueller F, Bagci S, Dresbach T, Grass T, Nitsch-Felsecker P, et al. Feasibility of bedside portable MRI in neonates and children during ECLS. Critical Care. 2023;27(1):134. 43. Kopp M, Heiss R, Wiesmueller M, Buchbender M, Kesting M, Nagel AM, et al. LOW-FIELD MRI OF NON-TRAUMATIC TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.55T AND 1.5T MRI. Osteoarthritis Imaging. 2023;3:100140. 44. Breit HC, Vosshenrich J, Hofmann V, Rusche T, Kovacs BK, Bach M, et al. Image Quality of Lumbar Spine Imaging at 0.55T Low-Field MRI is Comparable to Conventional 1.5T MRI - Initial Observations in Healthy Volunteers. Academic radiology. 2023. 45. Marques JP, Simonis FFJ, Webb A. Low‐field MRI: An MR Physics Perspective. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019. 46. Hori M, Hagiwara A, Goto M, Wada A, Aoki S. Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Investigative Radiology. 2021. 47. Deoni SCL, O'Muircheartaigh J, Ljungberg E, Huentelman M, Williams SCR. Simultaneous high-resolution T(2) -weighted imaging and quantitative T(2) mapping at low magnetic field strengths using a multiple TE and multi-orientation acquisition approach. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2022;88(3):1273-81. 48. Francis S, Susan W, Michael G, Duke H, Judy I, Kimberly W, et al. Challenges in Deploying Low-Field and Ultra-Low Field MRI in Research, Clinical Care, Population Screening, and Direct-to-Consumer Use (P15-7.001). Neurology. 2022;98(18 Supplement):586. 49. Yushchenko M, Choquet P, Salameh N, Sarracanie M. Biplanar quadrature coil for versatile low-field extremity MRI. Frontiers in Physics. 2023;11. 50. Khodarahmi I, Keerthivasan MB, Brinkmann IM, Grodzki D, Fritz J. Modern Low-Field MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. Investigative Radiology. 2022. 51. Shen S, Koonjoo N, Kong X, Rosen MS, Xu Z. Gradient Coil Design and Optimization for an Ultra-Low-Field MRI System. Applied Magnetic Resonance. 2022;53(6):895-914.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Articles in Press | |
| Section | Literature (Narrative) Review(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| “Low field MRI” “Magnetic Resonance Imaging” “Portable MRI” “Image Quality” “Artificial Intelligence” | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Elhaie M, Koozari A, Abedi I, Mohammadi-Sadr M, Monsef A. Small Magnets, Big Future: Low-Field MRI Technology and Clinical Utility. Frontiers Biomed Technol. 2024;.
