Original Article

The Impact of Preprocessing on the PET-CT Radiomics Features in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of image preprocessing steps, including Gray Level Discretization (GLD) and different Interpolation Algorithms (IA) on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) radiomics features in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two radiomics features from the first-, second-, and higher-order statistic features were calculated from a set of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) images of 20 non-small cell lung cancer delineated tumors with volumes ranging from 10 to 418 cm3 regarding five intensity discretization schemes with the number of gray levels of 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256, and four Interpolation algorithms, including nearest neighbor, tricubic convolution and tricubic spline interpolation, and trilinear were used. Segmentation was based on 3D region growing-based. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Overall Concordance Correlation Coefficient (OCCC), and Coefficient Of Variations (COV) were calculated to demonstrate the features' variability and select robust features. ICC and OCCC < 0.5 presented weak reliability, ICC and OCCC between 0.5 and 0.75 illustrated appropriate reliability, values within 0.75 and 0.9 showed satisfying reliability, and values higher than 0.90 indicate exceptional reliability. Besides, features with less than 10% COV have been selected as robust features.

Results: All morphology family (except four features), statistic, and Intensity volume histogram families were not affected by GLD and IA. And the rest of them, 10 and 61 features showed COV ≤ 5% against GLD and IA, respectively. Ten and 80 features showed excellent reliability (ICC values greater than 0.90) against GLD and IA. Eight and 60 features showed OCCC≥0.90 against GLD and IA, respectively. Based on our results Inverse difference normalized and Inverse difference moment normalized from Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) were the most robust features against GLD and Skewness from intensity histogram family and Inverse difference normalized and Inverse difference moment normalized from GLCM were the most robust features against IA.

Conclusion: Preprocessing can substantially impact the 18F-FDG PET image radiomic features in NSCLC. The impact of gray level discretization on radiomics features is significant and more than Interpolation algorithms.

1- C. Fitzmaurice et al., "Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study," JAMA oncology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 524-548, 2017.
2- R. Siegel, E. Ward, O. Brawley, and A. Jemal, "Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths." CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 212-236, 2011.
3- I. R. S. Valente, P. C. Cortez, E. C. Neto, J. M. Soares, V. H. C. de Albuquerque, and J. M. R. Tavares, "Automatic 3D pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: a survey." Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 124, pp. 91-107, 2016.
4- J. F. Palma, P. Das, and O. Liesenfeld, "Lung cancer screening: utility of molecular applications in conjunction with low-dose computed tomography guidelines." Expert review of molecular diagnostics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 435-447, 2016.
5- H. J. Aerts et al., "Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach," Nature communications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2014.
6- B. Ganeshan, E. Panayiotou, K. Burnand, S. Dizdarevic, and K. Miles, "Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival," European radiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 796-802, 2012.
7- Y. Balagurunathan et al., "Reproducibility and prognosis of quantitative features extracted from CT images." Translational oncology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 72-87, 2014.
8- G. J. Weiss et al., "Noninvasive image texture analysis differentiates K-ras mutation from pan-wildtype NSCLC and is prognostic." PloS one, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e100244, 2014.
9- O. Gevaert et al., "Non–small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data—methods and preliminary results." Radiology, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 387-396, 2012.
10- R. J. Gillies, P. E. Kinahan, and H. Hricak, "Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data." Radiology, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. 563-577, 2016.
11- P. Lambin et al., "Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine," Nature reviews Clinical oncology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 749-762, 2017.
12- S. S. Yip and H. J. Aerts, "Applications and limitations of radiomics," Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 61, no. 13, p. R150, 2016.
13- J. E. Park, S. Y. Park, H. J. Kim, and H. S. Kim, "Reproducibility and generalizability in radiomics modeling: possible strategies in radiologic and statistical perspectives," Korean journal of radiology, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1124, 2019.
14- M. Shafiq‐ul‐Hassan et al., "Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels," Medical physics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1050-1062, 2017.
15- R. T. Larue et al., "Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study," Acta oncologica, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1544-1553, 2017.
16- B. A. Altazi et al., "Reproducibility of F18‐FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray‐level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms," Journal of applied clinical medical physics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 32-48, 2017.
17- I. Shiri, A. Rahmim, P. Ghaffarian, P. Geramifar, H. Abdollahi, and A. Bitarafan-Rajabi, "The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies," European radiology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4498-4509, 2017.
18- A. Fedorov et al., "3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network," Magnetic resonance imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1323-1341, 2012.
19- S. Ashrafinia, "Quantitative nuclear medicine imaging using advanced image reconstruction and radiomics," Johns Hopkins University, 2019.
20- A. Zwanenburg, S. Leger, M. Vallières, and S. Löck, "Image biomarker standardisation initiative-feature definitions," arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.07003, 2016.
21- A. Zwanenburg, S. Leger, M. Vallières, and S. Löck, "Image biomarker standardisation initiative." arXiv preprint arXiv: 161207003," 2016.
22- T. K. Koo and M. Y. Li, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research," Journal of chiropractic medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155-163, 2016.
23- K. O. McGraw and S. P. Wong, "Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients," Psychological methods, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 30, 1996.
24- J. J. Bartko, "The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability," Psychological reports, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3-11, 1966.
25- P. E. Shrout and J. L. Fleiss, "Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability," Psychological bulletin, vol. 86, no. 2, p. 420, 1979.
26- I. Lawrence and K. Lin, "A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility," Biometrics, pp. 255-268, 1989.
27- H. X. Barnhart, M. Haber, and J. Song, "Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers," Biometrics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1020-1027, 2002.
28- A. Oikonomou et al., "Radiomics analysis at PET/CT contributes to prognosis of recurrence and survival in lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy," Scientific reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2018.
29- A. Traverso, L. Wee, A. Dekker, and R. Gillies, "Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review," International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1143-1158, 2018.
30- S. Gourtsoyianni et al., "Primary rectal cancer: repeatability of global and local-regional MR imaging texture features," Radiology, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 552-561, 2017.
31- C. Davatzikos et al., "Cancer imaging phenomics toolkit: quantitative imaging analytics for precision diagnostics and predictive modeling of clinical outcome," Journal of medical imaging, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 011018, 2018.
32- J. J. Van Griethuysen et al., "Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype," Cancer research, vol. 77, no. 21, pp. e104-e107, 2017.
33- C. Nioche et al., "LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity," Cancer research, vol. 78, no. 16, pp. 4786-4789, 2018.
34- Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med; 15(2): pp. 155–63, 2016.
Files
IssueVol 8 No 4 (2021) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v8i4.7754
Keywords
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Gray Level Discretization Interpolation Algorithms Radiomics Features Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Hosseini SA, Shiri I, Hajianfar G, Ghafarian P, Bakhshayesh Karam M, Ay MR. The Impact of Preprocessing on the PET-CT Radiomics Features in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Frontiers Biomed Technol. 2021;8(4):261-272.