Original Article

Evaluation of Conventional Radiographic Systems in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences: A Multi-Centric Quality Control Study

Abstract

Introduction: Generally, the benefits of radiological examinations performed on individuals far outweigh their risks; however, this is not true when the radiographic system fails to work properly. Therefore, to avoid such errors, it is crucial to frequently perform Quality Control (QC) checks in an imaging facility.

Material and Methods: A total of 11 highly-referred centers out of 62 radiology rooms located in Yazd province were included in this investigation, and QC tests comprising light/radiation field alignment, the accuracy of kilovoltage and exposure time, reproducibility of kilovoltage, exposure time, and output, and linearity of output against exposure time and milliamperage were performed for each equipment. The light and radiation field alignment test were carried out by a quantitative assessment of digital images of a collimator template (PTW-Freiburg, Germany). The measurements were made by a Barracuda package and a Multi-Purpose Detector (MPD).

Results: In terms of the light/radiation field alignment check, unit A failed to satisfy the national regulations. Concerning the timer reproducibility, 64% of the units failed to meet the criteria. All of the devices passed the rest of the checks satisfactorily.

Conclusion: This study uncovered that most of the radiology rooms in Yazd province are in an adequate situation based on the QC tests; however, more than half of the units do not satisfy the timer reproducibility criteria. Hence, more supervision needs to be directed at these systems by qualified radiation safety officers who are responsible for the protection of the population against ionization radiation.

1-Gocht H. Die Röntgen-literatur: F. Enke; 1921.
2-Hart D, Wall B, Hillier M, Shrimpton P. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Health Protection Agency. 2010.
3-Radiation U. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. New York: United Nations, 2010.
4-Mettler Jr FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology;248(1):254-63, 2008.
5-Regulla DF, Eder H. Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe. Radiation protection dosimetry;114(1-3):11-25, 2005.
6-Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine;357(22):2277-84, 2007.
7-Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;100(24):13761-6, 2003.
8-Hall E, Brenner D. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. The British journal of radiology;81(965):362-78, 2008.
9-Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K-P, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Archives of internal medicine;169(22):2078-86, 2009.
10-Hall E, Brenner D. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. The British journal of radiology;85(1020): e1316-e7, 2012.
11-Sungita YY, Mdoe SS, Msaki P. Diagnostic X‐ray facilities as per quality control performances in Tanzania. Journal of applied clinical medical physics;7(4):66-73, 2006.
12-AEOI. The instruction for quality control in diagnostic imaging equipements. Iran, Islamic Republic of: Atomic Energy Organization of Iran; 2011.
13-Shepard S, Lin P, Boone J, Cody D, Fisher J, Frey G, et al. AAPM Report No. 74 Quality Control in Diagnostic Radiology. Report of the Task Group,12, 2002;
14-Jomehzadeh Z, Jomehzadeh A, Tavakoli MB. Quality Control Assessment of Radiology Devices in Kerman Province, Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics;13(1):25-35, 2016.
15-Gholamhosseinian-Najjar H, Bahreyni-Toosi M-T, Zare M-H, Sadeghi H-R, Sadoughi H-R. Quality control status of radiology centers of hospitals associated with mashhad university of medical sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics;11(1):182-7, 2014.
Files
IssueVol 8 No 3 (2021) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v8i3.7116
Keywords
Quality Control Conventional Radiology Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Yazd

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Masjedi H, Zamani H, Dalvand S, Zare MH. Evaluation of Conventional Radiographic Systems in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences: A Multi-Centric Quality Control Study. Frontiers Biomed Technol. 2021;8(3):211-218.