Original Article

Dose Assessment in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer after Metal Artifact Reduction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation CT Scanner: A Clinical Study

Abstract

Purpose: Metal artifacts cause to increase in the uncorrected dose evaluation during radiotherapy planning. This study aimed to evaluate the probable difference of the dose parameters calculated by the Treatment Planning System (TPS) in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer before and after metal artifact correction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation Computed Tomography (CT) images.

Materials and Methods: In the present study, the radiotherapy planning of the head and neck cancer from thirty patients was first performed on the CT default images with dental implants. The same processes were applied after performing a body standard metal kernel on the CT images to reduce the metal artifacts. The Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and Organ At Risks (OARs) were contoured on the CT slices. The dosimetric parameters (mean, minimum, and maximum) for the GTV and OARs (eyes and spinal cord) were obtained for both sets of CT images (defaults and filtered). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate the probability dose variations between the two sets.

Results: There are significant differences in several dose parameters between the default and filtered CT images (P-value < 0.05). These dosimetric parameters are related to the GTV (mean dose), spinal cord (minimum and mean doses), right eye (maximum dose), as well as left eye (mean dose). The average range of dose differences between the default and filtered images was obtained; 1.12%-3.11% for the GTV as well as 0.22%-12.05% for the OARs.

Conclusion: Based on the results, the body standard metal kernel can cause a significant difference in several dosimetric parameters of GTV and OARs during the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Therefore, it is recommended to make a metal artifact correction on CT images for accurate dose calculation before designing a treatment plan.

1- Davoudi M, Khoramian D, Abedi-Firouzjah R, Ataei G. "Strategy of computed tomography image optimisation in cervical vertebrae and neck soft tissue in emergency patients.", Radiat Prot Dosimetry.;187(1):98–102, (2019).
2- Khoramian D, Sistani S, Firouzjah RA. "Assessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinations.", Pol J Radiol. (2019); 84:e61.
3- Kiapour M, Gorji KE, Mehraeen R, Ghaemian N, Sustani FN, Abedi-Firouzjah R, et al. "Can Common Lead Apron in Testes Region Cause Radiation Dose Reduction during Chest CT Scan? A Patient Study.", J Biomed Phys Eng;11(4):497, (2021).
4- Awe OO, Obed RI, Adekanmi AJ, Ogbole GI, Agbele AT. "Thyroid dose and cancer risk from head and neck computed tomography at two selected centres in Nigeria.", Niger Postgrad Med J.;28(4):278, (2021).
5- Huang JY, Kerns JR, Nute JL, Liu X, Balter PA, Stingo FC, et al. "An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging." Phys Med Biol.;60(3):1047, (2015).
6- Hansen CR, Christiansen RL, Lorenzen EL, Bertelsen AS, Asmussen JT, Gyldenkerne N, et al. "Contouring and dose calculation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy after reduction of metal artifacts in CT images." Acta Oncol.;56(6):874–8, (2017).
7- Bazalova M, Beaulieu L, Palefsky S, Verhaegen F. "Correction of CT artifacts and its influence on Monte Carlo dose calculations.", Med Phys.;34(6Part1):2119–32, (2007).
8- Kilby W, Sage J, Rabett V. "Tolerance levels for quality assurance of electron density values generated from CT in radiotherapy treatment planning.", Phys Med Biol.;47(9):1485, (2002).
9- Boas FE, Fleischmann D. "Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography.", Radiology.;259(3):894–902, (2011).
10- Spadea MF, Verburg JM, Baroni G, Seco J. "The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms.", Med Phys.;41(1):011702, (2014).
11- Li H, Noel C, Chen H, Harold Li H, Low D, Moore K, et al. "Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy.", Med Phys.;39(12):7507–17, (2012).
12- Hilgers G, Nuver T, Minken A. "The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants.", J Appl Clin Med Phys.;15(1):274–8, (2014).
13- Glide-Hurst C, Chen D, Zhong H, Chetty IJ. "Changes realized from extended bit-depth and metal artifact reduction in CT.", Med Phys.;40(6Part1):061711, (2013).
14- Huang JY, Eklund D, Childress NL, Howell RM, Mirkovic D, Followill DS, et al. "Investigation of various energy deposition kernel refinements for the convolution/superposition method.", Med Phys.;40(12):121721, (2013).
15- Washio H, Ohira S, Funama Y, Morimoto M, Wada K, Yagi M, et al. "Metal artifact reduction using iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm for head and neck radiation therapy: A phantom and clinical study.", Eur J Radiol.;132:109293, (2020).
16- Hansen CR, Johansen J, Kristensen CA, Smulders B, Andersen LJ, Samsøe E, et al. "Quality assurance of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients treated in DAHANCA 10 randomized trial.", Acta Oncol.;54(9):1669–73, (2015).
17- Bushberg JT, Boone JM. "The essential physics of medical imaging." Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (2011).
18- Gardner SJ, Mao W, Liu C, Aref I, Elshaikh M, Lee JK, et al. "Improvements in CBCT image quality using a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm: a clinical evaluation.", Adv Radiat Oncol.;4(2):390–400, (2019).
19- Mao W, Liu C, Gardner SJ, Siddiqui F, Snyder KC, Kumarasiri A, et al. "Evaluation and clinical application of a commercially available iterative reconstruction algorithm for CBCT-based IGRT.", Technol Cancer Res Treat.;18:1533033818823054, (2019).
20- Lee M-J, Kim S, Lee S-A, Song H-T, Huh Y-M, Kim D-H, et al. "Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT." Radiographics.;27(3):791–803, (2007).
21- Lell MM, Meyer E, Kuefner MA, May MS, Raupach R, Uder M, et al. "Normalized metal artifact reduction in head and neck computed tomography.", Invest Radiol.;47(7):415–21, (2012).
22- Andersson KM, Dahlgren CV, Reizenstein J, Cao Y, Ahnesjö A, Thunberg P. "Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area." Med Phys.;45(10):4329–44, (2018).
Files
IssueVol 10 No 1 (2023) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11510
Keywords
Computed Tomography Radiotherapy Metal Artifacts Head and Neck Tumors Dose
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Abedini A, Ebrahimnejad Gorji K, Ghaemian N, Soleimani Varaki S, Davoudi M, Tolulope Agbele A, Shabestani Monfared A. Dose Assessment in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer after Metal Artifact Reduction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation CT Scanner: A Clinical Study. Frontiers Biomed Technol. 2022;10(1):32-37.