CT-Based Auto Lung Damage Assessment COVID-19
Abstract
Purpose: Monitoring disease development or viruses that invade our bodies, such as Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19), can be effectively carried out using Computed Tomography (CT) imaging tools. However, manual assessment of CT images by consultants is often insufficient for determining the extent of lung damage in COVID-19 patients. Automated evaluation of lung damage addresses this limitation by optimizing healthcare resource utilization. It reduces the workload on radiologists, allowing them to concentrate on more complex cases. Additionally, it ensures accurate and consistent assessments of lung damage, minimizing variability and the potential for human error inherent in manual evaluations.
Materials and Methods: In this study, a new approach was presented for improving CT images of the lung and specifying further lesions. This will help calculate the extent of damage without human intervention. The structure of the proposed technique draws upon four phases (data collection, improvement, segmentation and extraction lung damage region and evaluation). Firstly, 100 patients were recruited between September 29 2020 and July 10, 2022, of whom tested positive for COVID-19 and CT images were collected, then composite technique is implemented to extract the percentage of lung damage of COVID-19 patients.
Results: The study results demonstrated an efficient method for quickly and practically calculating the percentage of lung damage. There is a clear convergence between manual evaluation, done by radiologists, and automatic evaluation using the proposed method, suggesting its potential as an alternative in the absence of a specialist doctor. The differences in the arithmetic mean between the proposed technique and the radiologists' evaluations were 3.5%, 10%, 18%, and 0.98% for radiologists 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Additionally, the findings indicated that individuals aged 20-60 years are the most affected by COVID-19.
Conclusion: This method serves as a potent tool for swiftly and practically assessing the percentage of lung damage caused by COVID-19. By eliminating the need for human intervention, it enables the evaluation of lung damage autonomously. This feature makes it particularly valuable in telemedicine applications and emergency situations where specialist medical expertise may not be readily available.
2- S. I. Jabbar., “Automated Analysis of Fatality Rates for COVID 19 across Different Countries.”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, pp. 521-526, (2021).
3- K. Li, Y. Fang, W. Li et al., “CT image visual quantitative evaluation and clinical classification of coronavirus disease (COVID-19)”. Eur Radiol 30, 4407–4416, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06817-6.
4- J. Pu, B. Zheng, J. K. Leader, C. Fuhrman, F.Knollmann, A. Klym, and D. Gur. “Pulmonary Lobe Segmentation in CT Examinations Using Implicit Surface Fitting”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 28(12), (2009).
5- E. M. Eslicka, L. Dale, C. Baileyb, B. Harrisb, J. Kipritidisa, M. Stevensb, et al, “Measurement of preoperative lobar lung function with computed tomography ventilation imaging: progress towards rapid stratification of lung cancer lobectomy patients with abnormal lung function”, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 49, 1075–1082, (2016).
6- X. He. et al. “Sample-Efficient Deep Learning for COVID-19 Diagnosis Based on CT Scans”, Health Informatics, (2020), https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20063941.
7- S. A. Harmon, et al. “Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets.”. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–7, (2020).
8- X. Zheng et al. “Deep learning-based detection for COVID-19 from chest CT using weak label.”, medrxiv, (2020).
9- L. Li., L. Qin, Z. Xu, Y. Yin, X. Wang, B, Kong, J. Bai, Y. Lu, Z. Fang, Q. Song, K. Cao., D. Liu D., G. Wang, Q. Xu, X. Fang, S. Zhang. and J. Xia., “Using artificial intelligence to detect covid-19 and community-acquired pneumonia based on pulmonary CT: Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy”, Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. E65–E71, (2020).
10- H. Gunraj, A. Sabri, D. Kof & A. Wong, “COVID-Net CT-2: Enhanced deep neural networks for detection of COVID-19 from Chest CT images through bigger, more diverse learning”. ARXiv:(2021).07433.
11- S. N. Kumar, A. Ahilan, A. Fred , H.A. Kumar, “ROI extraction in CT lung images of COVID-19 using Fast Fuzzy C means clustering”. Chapter in Biomedical Engineering Tools for Management for Patients with COVID-19.103–19. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824473-9.00001-X. Epub (2021) Jun 11. PMCID: PMC8192313.
12- A. Alzahrani, A. Bhuiyan, F. Akhter.” Detecting COVID-19 Pneumonia over Fuzzy Image Enhancement on Computed Tomography Images”, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. (2022), Article ID 1043299, 12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1043299.
13- S. I. Jabbar, et al. “Analysis of CT images of the COVID-19 patients.”, Muthanna International Conference on Engineering Science and Technology (MICEST), (2022), pp. 60-64, doi: 10.1109/MICEST54286.2022.9790201.
14- I. A. Tache; D. Glotsos; S. M. Stanciu, “Classification of Pulmonary Damage Stages Caused by COVID-19 Disease from CT scans via Transfer Learning”, Bioengineering, 10, 6, (2003), https://doi.org/10.3390/ bioengineering10010006
15- L. Wang, X. Wang, and L. Liu, “Application of anisotropic diffusion filtering in seismic data processing”, International Conference on Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), pp. 3046-3049, (2011), doi: 10.1109/CSSS.2011.5972114.
16- Y.C. Lee, C. W. Jen, “Edge-preserving texture filtering for real-time rendering”. Visual Computer 19, 10–22, (2003), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-002-0169-8
17- C. Tang, L. Wang, and H. Yan, “Overview of anisotropic filtering methods based on partial differential equations for electronic speckle pattern interferometry”, Applied Optics, 51(20), 4916-4926, (2012).
18- N. Otsu. “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms”. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man. Cyber, 9(1): 62–66, (1979), doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
19- M. Sezgin & B. Sankur, “Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation”, Journal of Electronic Imaging. 13 (1): 146–165, (2004). doi:10.1117/1.1631315
20- S. I. Jabbar, C. Day and E. Chadwick.” Automated measurements of morphological parameters of muscles and tendons.", Biomedical Physics and Engineering express, 7(2) 1-11, (2021).
21- S. J. Kumar and C. G. Ravichandran. “Morphological operation detection of retinal image segmentation”, International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS), pp. 1228-1235, (2017), doi: 10.1109/ISS1.2017.8389381.
22- D. V. Obradović, G. B. Marković and I. P. Pokrajać., “Application of morphological operations in spectrum segmentation process for direction finding”, 24th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), pp. 1-4, (2016), doi: 10.1109/TELFOR.2016.7818766.
23- K. Immink, and J. Weber,.” Minimum Pearson distance detection for multilevel channels with gain and / or offset mismatch”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 60 (10): 5966–5974, (2010), CiteSeerX 10.1.1.642.9971.
24- L. Chun Sing, Yingshan T. et al.”A robust correlation analysis framework for imbalanced and dichotomous data with uncertainty”, Information Sciences. 470: 58–77, (2019).
25- D. Nikolić, R.C.Muresan, W. Feng; W. Singer, “ Scaled correlation analysis: a better way to compute a cross-correlogram" , European Journal of Neuroscience. 35 (5), (2012) 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07987.x. PMID 22324876. S2CID 4694570.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 12 No 4 (2025) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v12i4.19816 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Image Analysis Lung Damage Assessment Radiologist Examination | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
